“Cybersecurity Computer-Based Training and Technical Communication Design”
by Lysandwr McNary | Xchanges 9.2
Although this analysis is of necessity a small scale examination, the results do indicate a lack of success on both counts. Coupled with a review of TC degree programs and cybersecurity related curricula at thirteen public universities, the results suggest the possibility that a lack of cross-discipline program emphasis has led to a shortage of personnel in the cybersecurity workforce with strong TC skills, knowledge, and abilities.
Keywords: cybersecurity, computer-based training, FISMA, information assurance, technical communication
Introduction
The discipline of Technical Communication strives to communicate information effectively both textually (in context) and visually (such as with graphics, use of space, and alignment.) Technical communicators must have an awareness of how humans absorb and process information from sentence and paragraph structure to font sizes to audio-visual media. This knowledge is especially pertinent to the development of training products, where technical communicators deal with instructional design and various levels of technology. The technological aspect becomes most important in specifically computer based training (CBT) product development.
The Federal Information Security Management Act (FISMA), issued in 2002, includes a set of requirements that are mandatory for all federal agencies and affiliated civilian entities that access federal information systems. A basic tenet of FISMA compliance includes information awareness training for all personnel with any access to federal information systems as an essential element in maintaining national cybersecurity. The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) is the primary agency tasked with providing guidance on meeting those training requirements (NIST Computer Security Division).
Besides the Technical Communication Bachelor of Science program at New Mexico Tech (NMT), the author has extensive experience with required “information assurance/awareness” and classified computer security training qualifying her to analyze training modules. In addition, she has participated in security training exercises through the NMT Computer Science department. Based on her observations, computer security (or cybersecurity) training does not appear to be commonly developed with technical communication standards of known best practices, eLearning design principles, and usability/effectiveness testing in mind. It is worth noting that a review of Technical Communication degrees offered by universities across the United States (Appendix A) shows that such programs don’t often include computer security or information awareness training; additionally, cybersecurity degree and certification programs generally don’t offer courses in training development.
Within the subject literature, there is a sizeable body of research on applying technical communication principles in order to create effective training. However, studies on cybersecurity training typically focus on how to accomplish immediate knowledge transfer rather than how effectively that transfer is accomplished. This deficit is illustrated via a literature review covering e-Learning and principles of design, up-to-date CBT technology available to technical communicators, and information awareness applications. Following the literature review, there is an examination of the primary FISMA-certified information assurance/awareness CBT module from the Department of Defense (DoD) in order to determine how successfully the training both satisfies FISMA/NIST requirements and demonstrates a clear application of TC best principles.
