“Students’ Perceptions of Written Instructor Feedback on Student Writing”
by Eric Wisz | Xchanges 13.2, Fall 2018
Introduction
We assume that feedback on student writing plays a pedagogically prominent role in students’ development as writers, just as class instruction, course readings, student-instructor writing conferences, or peer writing tutoring sessions. Indeed, there is much overlap between these forms of instruction, but for the purpose of this article, I focus on written instructor feedback on student writing.
The meaning of written instructor feedback influences how students conduct their revision processes and future writing processes and, thus, how they view the act of writing. In his inquiry into instructor feedback on student writing, Straub (1996) finds that “the way comments are framed has a direct influence on the meaning of the comments” (p. 235). Thus, this article focuses on, more specifically, student perceptions of instructor feedback on their writing. My overall research question is the following: How do students perceive instructor feedback on student writing when different feedback approaches are presented? Student perspectives in this report take the form of transcripts from student interviews. Due to the limited scope of this project (12 student interviews), the data gathered from these interviews should not be generalized to all students. Rather, the purpose of this study is to contribute student voices to the ongoing discussion on instructor feedback practices.
I begin by offering an overview of some of the relevant literature from the field of composition studies pertaining to instructor feedback on student writing. I then outline how the interviews in this study were conducted and detail some relevant participant demographics. Finally, I discuss some of the students’ impressions, interpretations, and uses of instructor feedback and what this could mean for feedback practices.
